List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element |
| |
1 | Analyse and evaluate current plant, equipment and processes | 1.1 | Compare actual process, plant and equipment performance with requirements and/or historical data/records and/or design performance |
| 1.2 | Identify abnormal or sub-optimal process, plant and equipment performance |
| 1.3 | Identify hazards associated with the plant and equipment |
| 1.4 | Collect and evaluate product, materials and/or process records to determine possible causes for sub-optimal performance |
| 1.5 | Use appropriate techniques to rank possible causes from most to least probable cause |
2 | Develop plan for corrective and/or optimisation action | 2.1 | Analyse causes to determine appropriate corrective action |
| 2.2 | Predict the impact of a change in one unit/area on other related plant units/areas |
| 2.3 | Predict the impact of a change on HSE performance |
| 2.4 | Develop measurable objectives and evaluate alternatives |
| 2.5 | Identify requirements to implement change |
| 2.6 | Consult with stakeholders regarding planned changes and impacts |
| 2.7 | Develop optimisation plan taking account of hazards identified and HSE implications and communicate to appropriate personnel |
| 2.8 | Evaluate optimisation action to determine measures of effectiveness |
3 | Coordinate corrective and/ or optimisation action plan | 3.1 | Coordinate all appropriate unit areas and operations in order to rectify problem causes in process, plant and equipment performance |
| 3.2 | Initiate and/or implement all required corrective/optimisation actions |
| 3.3 | Communicate corrective/optimisation outcomes to all relevant personnel |
| 3.4 | Record and maintain log of all relevant information |
4 | Develop continuous improvement strategies | 4.1 | Identify opportunities to continuously improve performance of process/plant area |
| 4.2 | Develop recommendations for continual improvement of process, plant and equipment effectiveness |
| 4.3 | Consult with appropriate personnel and implement continuous improvement strategies |
| 4.4 | Document implementation of continuous improvement strategies |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and demonstrate the ability to:
identify and interpret information from a range of internal and external sources
use analytical techniques to identify cause of a complex problem
determine corrective actions to optimise the condition of the process, plant and equipment
plan and coordinate corrective/optimisation actions and related changes that may be required
develop written plans
complete documentation
identify and control hazards by applying the hierarchy of control as part of the optimisation process
distinguish between:
optimum and marginal performance of the plant
effective and marginal performance corrections and actions
communicate and consult with stakeholders at all levels
read and interpret technical information and relevant regulatory requirements
develop and implement continuous improvement strategies.
Evidence must be provided that demonstrates knowledge of:
hazards that may arise in the job/work environment, including:
their possible causes
potential consequences
appropriate risk controls
relevant technical theory of the plant area
an in depth understanding of plant and process across the entire plant area being optimised
process parameters and limits, including:
temperature
pressure
flow
pH
effects of variations in process conditions and materials
functions and principles of operation of equipment in the production process
chemistry and/or physics and/or biology/biochemistry relevant to changes to materials during processing.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:
a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria
multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.
It is desirable that this evidence comes from implemented optimisation projects. However, where the project does not receive sanction to be implemented, or is otherwise not implemented, then sufficient evidence may be able to be obtained from a detailed implementation plan and a simulated implementation.
A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.
Assessment should occur in operational workplace situations. Where this is not possible, or practical, assessment must occur in a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment reflecting realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
As a minimum, assessors must satisfy the Standards for Registered Training Organisations 2015 assessor requirements