List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element |
| |
1 | Contribute to the selection of equipment/ process conditions | 1.1 | Liaise with appropriate technical experts |
| 1.2 | Interpret properties of materials and desired product characteristics |
| 1.3 | Interpret technical specifications/drawings of plant requirements |
| 1.4 | Recommend equipment/ancillary equipment appropriate for the materials, products and conditions |
| 1.5 | Recommend process conditions appropriate for the equipment, materials and product characteristics |
| 1.6 | Recommend feed rates/order/condition appropriate to the process conditions, equipment, materials and product characteristics |
| 1.7 | Ensure hazard identification and analysis procedures are completed, including consultation with stakeholders, and findings included in plan |
| 1.8 | Ensure recommendations meet the identified need |
2 | Prepare for trials | 2.1 | Determine the availability of resources required, such as materials, equipment, people and skills |
| 2.2 | Estimate time required for trial |
| 2.3 | Liaise with relevant stakeholders |
| 2.4 | Schedule trial at a convenient time |
| 2.5 | Develop documentation for the trial |
| 2.6 | Identify potential hazards and required hazard control procedures by applying the hierarchy of control |
| 2.7 | Determine permit and other authorisation requirements and special safety and storage requirements |
| 2.8 | Verify decisions with appropriate experts/stakeholders |
| 2.9 | Ensure people with adequate skills are available for the trial |
3 | Conduct trials | 3.1 | Ensure hazard controls are implemented prior to commencement |
| 3.2 | Run trials |
| 3.3 | Maintain communication with all relevant personnel |
| 3.4 | Closely monitor critical parameters |
| 3.5 | Recognise actual and potential problems |
| 3.6 | Make adjustments to process conditions as required during trial |
| 3.7 | Sample and test product as required |
| 3.8 | Record and report performance data |
| 3.9 | Ensure all materials, products and waste are handled correctly |
| 3.10 | Leave plant in a condition suitable for routine production to recommence |
4 | Evaluate results and identify modifications | 4.1 | Interpret data from trial |
| 4.2 | Identify factors which might be related to low rates or low charge amounts |
| 4.3 | Recommend modifications and improvements required |
| 4.4 | Develop and check standard operating procedures (SOPs) |
| 4.5 | Complete documentation and report to appropriate personnel |
| 4.6 | Ensure all relevant staff have required skill levels for the introduction of the new process |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and demonstrate the ability to:
analyse technical information from a range of sources
determine recommendations for new process or product, including:
materials
equipment
process and process conditions
required variations in process variables
plan the trials
conduct trials
communicate and liaise with people at a range of levels about technical matters
write technical documentation, including specifications and procedures required for the trial
ensure formal hazard analysis procedures are undertaken
recognise early warning signs of equipment/processes or potential problems needing attention
isolate the causes of problems to an item of equipment within the plant system
identify any additional skills needs.
Evidence must be provided that demonstrates knowledge of:
organisation procedures
relevant technical theory of the plant area
chemistry and/or physics and/or biology/biochemistry relevant to changes to materials during processing
effects of variations in process conditions and materials
routine and non-routine problems that may arise, the range of possible causes and processes to develop solutions
methods of changing rate and the advantages and disadvantages of each
methods of controlling other process variables and the advantages and disadvantages of each.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:
a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria
multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.
The trial may, or may not be a success.
A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.
Assessment should occur in operational workplace situations. Where this is not possible or practical, assessment must occur in a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment reflecting realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent, process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
As a minimum, assessors must satisfy the Standards for Registered Training Organisations 2015 assessor requirements.