List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Recognise there is a problem | 1.1 | Compare current performance with expected/historic performance |
| 1.2 | Identify plant/process areas with poor performance |
| 1.3 | Check the impact of routine adjustments to improve performance |
| 1.4 | Identify problems not solved by the routine solutions |
|
2 | Define the problem | 2.1 | Apply problem isolation techniques to isolate problem to a small part of the plant/process |
| 2.2 | Quantify the effect of the problem in operational terms |
| 2.3 | Postulate possible causes of the problem |
| 2.4 | Identify types of evidence of each possible cause |
| 2.5 | Investigate problem to accumulate evidence of cause type |
| 2.6 | Analyse data to confirm cause of problem |
| 2.7 | Determine the level of severity of the problem and priority of any required action |
|
3 | Develop solution | 3.1 | Discuss possible solutions to cause with stakeholders and technical experts |
| 3.2 | Determine whether a quick fix is needed |
| 3.3 | Arrange for implementation of quick fix if required |
| 3.4 | Check effectiveness of quick fix and take action to maintain stable, safe operation |
| 3.5 | Agree required final solution with stakeholders and technical experts |
| 3.6 | Arrange for required solution to be undertaken in appropriate timeframe |
| 3.7 | Follow items initiated through until final resolution has occurred |
| 3.8 | Check effectiveness of solution and take action to maintain or improve outcome |
| 3.9 | Complete reports to procedure |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria, and include the ability to:
recognise signs of variations of plant and process that indicate different types of problems
select and apply problem isolation and analysis techniques to determine the most likely cause of problem
determine and initiate any immediate corrective action (quick fix) required
determine and initiate longer term solution
communicate and negotiate effectively with all stakeholders
follow through to ensure resolution of problems
undertake calculations.
Evidence must be provided that demonstrates knowledge of:
principles of operation and process science for all unit operations within the system/area and the interrelationships between them
cause/effect relationships between plant/process condition and process variable values
indicators of abnormal process situations, and evidence of which cause is responsible for the abnormal situation
impact of variations in plant and process and the distinctive signs of each variation (e.g. lower quality, lower rates, greater variability or greater difficulty in control).
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
Where competency has not been previously attained in MSMSUP390 Use structured problem-solving tools it may be co-delivered and co-assessed.
The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:
a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria
multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.
A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.
Assessment should use a simulated environment that reflects realistic operational workplace conditions that cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills, or a real project in an operational workplace.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition, the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment must demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they must assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on-the-job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work.