List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Prepare for work | 1.1 | Receive and give shift handover |
| 1.2 | Identify work requirements |
| 1.3 | Identify and control hazards |
| 1.4 | Coordinate with appropriate personnel |
| 1.5 | Check for recent work undertaken on wells and gathering systems |
| 1.6 | Note any outstanding/incomplete work |
| 1.7 | Check operational status of wells and gathering systems |
| 1.8 | Determine appropriate schedule and priorities for work |
|
2 | Operate site, well/system and equipment | 2.1 | Complete site checks |
| 2.2 | Use well control systems |
| 2.3 | Take required reading |
| 2.4 | Operate plant. |
| 2.5 | Start up/shut down well/system |
| 2.6 | Isolate/de-isolate an item of, or an entire well/system |
|
3 | Optimise wells and gathering systems | 3.1 | Analyse network |
| 3.2 | Interpret network communication |
| 3.3 | Determine processing plant requirements and the impact of this on well and system operation |
| 3.4 | Investigate status of individual wells |
| 3.5 | Advise well operator of needed adjustments |
| 3.6 | Recommend well stimulation or other required action |
| 3.7 | Ensure flows from wells and systems meet plant and organisation needs |
| 3.8 | Complete logs and reports as required |
|
4 | Prioritise and organise work | 4.1 | Ensure required maintenance work has been requested |
| 4.2 | Prioritise maintenance work in liaison with appropriate personnel |
| 4.3 | Organise well shutdowns to suit production requirements where practical |
| 4.4 | Coordinate field operators to ensure their work and priorities match plant and organisation requirements |
|
5 | Solve problems | 5.1 | Provide guidance to operators for shutdown/start-up as required |
| 5.2 | Develop the technical problem-solving capability of well operators |
| 5.3 | Analyse data from wells and systems to identify systemic or recurring problems |
| 5.4 | Take action to solve problems |
|
6 | Finalise shift activities | 6.1 | Complete shift tasks as appropriate |
| 6.2 | Ensure identified faults are correctly logged/reported for action |
| 6.3 | Ensure incomplete tasks are scheduled for follow-up |
| 6.4 | Ensure all logs and reporting are complete and understood |
| 6.5 | Check operators have completed required tasks |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria, and include the ability to:
undertake readings and operate and monitor well system
analyse and interpret network communication and data on individual wells and recommend action to ensure flow meets plant and organisation needs
perform site checks, start-up/shutdown procedures, and isolations and de-isolations
interpret fluid level readings and maintain fluid levels
plan and coordinate the work of the team
develop the technical problem solving capability of well operators
identify early warning signs of equipment/processes needing attention or with potential problems
identify hazards and risks and apply risk control procedures
communicate effectively with team, group, supervisors and other personnel
calculate volumetric flow rates and equipment efficiencies.
Evidence must be provided that demonstrates knowledge of:
oil/gas formation, structure and completions for coal seam gas (CSG), traditional or other oil/gas formations
coal type and structure or other bedrock structures
well design and construction
inter-well communications (e.g. pressure, flow and other technical parameters)
well status data (e.g. well flows, flow rates, pressure and temperature, downhole conditions and information)
hydrate formation
free flow and pumped wells
pumping principles
gas flow principles
gas/water separation principles
draining and venting requirements
corrosion control, chemical handling and safety data sheets (SDS)
flange pressure and temperature ratings (basic)
cathodic protection (basic)
downhole drawings (DHDs) and their application to plant/well operation
remote terminal unit, functions, operation and problems
pump, drivehead, fuel gas systems operations and principles
fluid dynamics and statics as relevant to the system
reservoir management
methods of changing production rates and the advantages and disadvantages of each
water testing and gas break through testing techniques
local lease and well operations requirements and constraints.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence:
should occur over a range of situations which include typical disruptions to normal, smooth operations
will typically include a supervisor/third-party report focusing on consistent performance and problem recognition and solving. A supervisor/third-party report must be prepared by someone who has a direct, relevant, current relationship with the person being assessed and who is in a position to form a judgement on workplace performance relevant to the unit of competency
must include the use of hydrocarbon wells and gathering systems allowing demonstration of operation
may use industry-based simulation for part of the unit particularly where safety, lack of opportunity or significant cost is an issue.
Assessment should occur in operational workplace situations. Where this is not possible, or where personal safety or environmental damage are limiting factors, assessment must occur in a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment reflecting realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Assessment in a simulated environment should use evidence collected from one or more of:
walk-throughs
pilot plant operation
demonstration of skills
industry-based case studies/scenarios
‘what ifs’.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence (provided a record is kept) or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition, the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment must demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they must assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on-the-job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work.