List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Prepare for HAZOP study | 1.1 | Explain the purpose of the HAZOP study |
| 1.2 | Review the key steps in undertaking the HAZOP study |
| 1.3 | Review the HAZOP tools to be used |
|
2 | Participate in a HAZOP study | 2.1 | Identify the purpose and operation of the new/modified equipment/process |
| 2.2 | Determine the normal operating conditions, method of operation and associated equipment and componentry of proposed change |
| 2.3 | Review relevant information to assist in the identification of possible problems |
| 2.4 | Process available information to identify potential hazards or operability issues |
| 2.5 | Identify potential hazards or operability issues and possible consequences utilising key words |
| 2.6 | Assess the risks arising from identified potential hazards or operability issues |
| 2.7 | Identify items needing further action |
| 2.8 | Review relevant operating and safety procedures |
| 2.9 | Recommend possible solutions to minimise risk of proposed change |
|
3 | Complete delegated actions within scope of responsibility | 3.1 | Perform delegated actions within area of responsibility |
| 3.2 | Follow initiated items through until final resolution has occurred |
| 3.3 | Identify problems needing further action |
| 3.4 | Determine possible fault causes within area of responsibility |
| 3.5 | Report outcomes to designated person |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria, and include the ability to:
analyse schematics and other sources of information to identify actual and/or potential hazards and recognise conditions that might lead to operability issues
utilise key words in the identification of potential hazards or operability issues
identify possible consequences and asses risks from identified potential hazards and operability issues
recommend possible solutions
complete actions delegated from the HAZOP
communicate effectively with multi-disciplinary stakeholders.
Evidence must be provided that demonstrates knowledge of:
the architecture and location of the process/production equipment
specific plant process operations
interactions between plant items/processes
product specifications and tolerances
systems operating parameters
system integrity limits
process control philosophies and strategies
emergency shutdown procedures
science (e.g. physics, chemistry and biochemistry) relevant to process and materials
impact of external factors (e.g. variations in weather and feed)
process drawings (e.g. piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs), process flow diagrams (PFDs), and cause and effect)
basis of control for the plant/s
instrumentation and control systems, components and loops as they relate to the modification under review
impacts of changing process/production equipment settings and the limits within which changes can be made
organisation procedures
work health and safety (WHS), hazardous substances and environmental requirements
enterprise standard operating procedures, plant processes and equipment for area under review
duty of care obligations
hierarchy of control.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:
a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria
multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.
A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.
Assessment should use a real project in an operational workplace. Where this is not possible or practical, assessment must occur using a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment reflecting realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition, the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment must demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they must assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on-the-job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work.