- PSPREG501B - Conduct prosecutions
Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners
PSPREG501B Mapping and Delivery Guide
Conduct prosecutions
Version 1.0
Issue Date: June 2024
Qualification | - |
Unit of Competency | PSPREG501B - Conduct prosecutions |
---|---|---|---|
Description | This unit describes the performance outcomes, skills and knowledge required to review a brief of evidence and prosecute offences while acting as the prosecutor in court.No licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements are applicable to this unit at the time of publication. | ||
Employability Skills | This unit contains employability skills. | ||
Learning Outcomes and Application | This unit applies to individuals in a range of non-police regulatory work environments who prosecute offenders under the enabling legislation. | ||
Duration and Setting | X weeks, nominally xx hours, delivered in a classroom/online/blended learning setting. |
||
Prerequisites/co-requisites | Not applicable. | ||
Competency Field | Regulatory. |
Development and validation strategy and guide for assessors and learners | Student Learning Resources | Handouts Activities |
Slides PPT |
Assessment 1 | Assessment 2 | Assessment 3 | Assessment 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Elements of Competency | Performance Criteria | |||||||
Element: Prepare for prosecution |
| |||||||
Element: Conduct a prosecution |
| |||||||
Element: Prepare for prosecution |
| |||||||
Element: Conduct a prosecution |
|
Evidence Required
List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
The Evidence Guide specifies the evidence required to demonstrate achievement in the unit of competency as a whole. It must be read in conjunction with the Unit descriptor, Performance Criteria, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Public Sector Training Package. | |
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit | In addition to integrated demonstration of the elements and their related performance criteria, look for evidence that confirms consistency of performance in conducting prosecutions. This will include evidence of: Conducting at least three actual or simulated prosecutions on three separate occasions or for three different situations/contexts. adhering to legal, ethical and organisational requirements relating to prosecutions |
Context of and specific resources for assessment | Assessment must ensure access to a real or simulated workplace environment that closely resembles normal work practice and replicates the range of conditions likely to be encountered while conducting prosecutions, including coping with difficulties, irregularities and breakdowns in routine. Access is required to resources such as: applicable legislation, policies and procedures case studies and workplace scenarios to capture the range of requirements for situations likely to be encountered mock court |
Method of assessment | Assessment methods suitable for valid and reliable assessment of this unit of competency may include, but are not limited to, a combination of 2 or more of: case studies demonstration observation written or oral questions scenarios simulation or role plays authenticated evidence from the workplace and/or training courses |
Guidance information for assessment | Assessment methods should reflect workplace demands, such as literacy, and the needs of particular groups, such as: people with disabilities people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people women young people older people people in rural and remote locations |
For consistency of assessment | Evidence must be gathered over time in a range of contexts to ensure the person can achieve the unit outcome and apply the competency in different situations or environments |
Submission Requirements
List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assignment, checklist) and due date here
Assessment task 1: [title] Due date:
(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)
Assessment Tasks
Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.
This section describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit. |
Skill requirements Look for evidence that confirms skills in: making presentations including participating in complex oral exchanges in briefing sessions and in court reading complex, lengthy documents to ascertain key elements undertaking research to identify precedents compiling and putting questions responding to diversity, including gender and disability applying procedures relating to occupational health and safety and environment in the context of prosecuting duties |
Knowledge requirements Look for evidence that confirms knowledge and understanding of: court prosecution process, procedures and protocols court conduct enabling legislation and offences sections of the Evidence Act types of evidence rules of evidence possible defences burden of proof role of expert witnesses hearsay equal employment opportunity, equity and diversity principles public sector legislation relating to occupational health and safety and environment in the context of conducting prosecutions |
The Range Statement provides information about the context in which the unit of competency is carried out. The variables cater for differences between States and Territories and the Commonwealth, and between organisations and workplaces. They allow for different work requirements, work practices and knowledge. The Range Statement also provides a focus for assessment. It relates to the unit as a whole. Text in bold italics in the Performance Criteria is explained here. | |
Briefs may include: | charges exhibits exhibit list evidence records investigators' reports witness list witness statements precedents forfeiture orders extracts prior convictions informant’s unsuitable dates for attendance recommended actions |
Proceedings may include: | court hearings tribunals trials pre-trial conferences |
Evidentiary procedures may include: | aspects of evidence in chief, cross-examination and re-examination |
Protocols may include: | court proceedings standards of dress forms of address |
Matters arising may include: | completing documentation/reports dealing with exhibits notifying outcomes arranging for witness fees appeal proceedings |
Cases may include: | ex parte plea of guilty argued matters |
Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.
Observation Checklist
Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice | Yes | No | Comments/feedback |
---|---|---|---|
Brief of evidence is reviewed and clarified with the apprehending officer, where necessary, prior to court proceedings | |||
Precedents are identified as relevant | |||
Questios are prepared to address the facts of the brief | |||
Personnel involved are fully briefed in accordance with legal and organisational requirements | |||
Parameters for negotiating out of court are agreed prior to prosecution with authorised organisational personnel | |||
Evidentiary procedures are followed and prosecution is conducted according to court processes, protocols and organisational instructions | |||
Personal presentation is maintained in accordance with organisational requirements | |||
File endorsements are completed in accordance with legislative and organisational requirements | |||
Matters arising from proceedings are followed up/completed in accordance with legislative and organisational requirements | |||
The outcome of the prosecution is reviewed to provide timely input/recommendations for handling future cases | |||
Brief of evidence is reviewed and clarified with the apprehending officer, where necessary, prior to court proceedings. | |||
Precedents are identified as relevant. | |||
Questions are prepared to address the facts of the brief. | |||
Personnel involved are fully briefed in accordance with legal and organisational requirements. | |||
Parameters for negotiating out of court are agreed prior to prosecution with authorised organisational personnel. | |||
Evidentiary procedures are followed and prosecution is conducted according to court processes, protocols and organisational instructions. | |||
Personal presentation is maintained in accordance with organisational requirements. | |||
File endorsements are completed in accordance with legislative and organisational requirements. | |||
Matters arising from proceedings are followed up/completed in accordance with legislative and organisational requirements. | |||
The outcome of the prosecution is reviewed to provide timely input/recommendations for handling future cases. |
Forms
Assessment Cover Sheet
PSPREG501B - Conduct prosecutions
Assessment task 1: [title]
Student name:
Student ID:
I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.
Student signature:
Result: Competent Not yet competent
Feedback to student
Assessor name:
Signature:
Date:
Assessment Record Sheet
PSPREG501B - Conduct prosecutions
Student name:
Student ID:
Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent
(add lines for each task)
Feedback to student:
Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent
Assessor name:
Signature:
Date:
Student signature:
Date: