- PSPFRAU401B - Monitor data for indicators of fraud
PSPFRAU401B
Monitor data for indicators of fraud
Application
Not applicable.
Prerequisites
Not applicable.
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENT | PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
1. Collate data | 1.1 Relevant data sources are identified and data is collected that is compatible, useful, relevant, reliable, valid and timely. 1.2 Data is organised in prescribed form in accordance with the identified information needs and uses. 1.3 Data is checked for accuracy, suitability and compliance with legal and privacy responsibilities and security. 1.4 The need to liaise with specialists is determined and acted on in accordance with organisational policy and procedures. 1.5 Ways to improve fraud and corruption control data content, interfaces and usefulness are monitored, and recommendations are made to supervisors and other stakeholders. |
2. Interrogate data | 2.1 Quantitative and/or qualitative analyses are performed to obtain required outcomes in accordance with the purpose of each analysis. 2.2 Analysis and description tools and techniques are selected appropriate to the nature of the information and the required outcome. 2.3 Priority of data to be interrogated is determined in consultation with appropriate people, and work is organised accordingly. 2.4 An understanding of the nature of the program or activity from which the data is obtained, the way in which the information is structured in the system and the likely indications of fraud and corruption activities are reflected in the analysis of material. 2.5 Preliminary recommendations are expressed in the detail, format and timeframe required. |
3. Monitor for indicators of fraud and corruption | 3.1 Fraud and corruption or possible fraud and corruption situations are identified, staff and systems alerted and actions initiated. 3.2 Where indicators arise for which there are no precedents, information is referred to the appropriate people for further analysis. 3.3 Trends indicating activities outside control limits are reported for further analysis and investigation. 3.4 Checks are made for internal consistency and compliance with established structure, rules and authorities for accessing information. 3.5 Variations from standards and guidelines are reported in accordance with organisational policy and procedures. |
Required Skills
This section describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit. |
Skill requirements Look for evidence that confirms skills in: undertaking research and analysis interrogating data to detect patterns indicating fraud and corruption applying effective management of data, abiding by all agency guidelines, formats and systems correctly recording data into information systems using data matching to identify factors required for an investigation collating and organising of data to assist in an investigation using a range of communication styles to suit different audiences and purposes responding to diversity, including gender and disability using computer software for data analysis and matching applying occupational health and safety and environmental procedures in the context of fraud and corruption control data monitoring literacy skills to effectively read and interpret data |
Knowledge requirements Look for evidence that confirms knowledge and understanding of: legislation and procedures relating to public interest disclosures, protected disclosures or whistleblowing privacy, confidentiality or other specific legislation and guidelines relating to fraud and corruption control freedom of information legislation guidelines issued by standards-setting organisations organisation's programs and client base legislation and corresponding links with the organisation's programs how data is managed within the organisation legislation, policies and procedures relating to fraud and corruption control including occupational health and safety and environment |
Evidence Required
The Evidence Guide specifies the evidence required to demonstrate achievement in the unit of competency as a whole. It must be read in conjunction with the Unit descriptor, Performance Criteria, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Public Sector Training Package. | |
Units to be assessed together | Pre-requisite units that must be achieved prior to this unit:Nil Co-requisite units that must be assessed with this unit:Nil Co-assessed units that may be assessed with this unit to increase the efficiency and realism of the assessment process include, but are not limited to: PSPETHC401A Uphold and support the values and principles of public service PSPGOV406B Gather and analyse information PSPLEGN401A Encourage compliance with legislation in the public sector PSPREG401C Exercise regulatory powers PSPREG402C Promote client compliance PSPREG415A Receive and validate data |
Overview of evidence requirements | In addition to integrated demonstration of the elements and their related performance criteria, look for evidence that confirms: the knowledge requirements of this unit the skill requirements of this unit application of the Employability Skills as they relate to this unit (see Employability Summaries in Qualifications Framework) monitoring of data for indicators of fraud and corruption in a range of (3 or more) contexts (or occasions, over time) |
Resources required to carry out assessment | These resources include: fraud and corruption control guidelines fraud investigation standards public sector values and codes of conduct organisational procedures and manuals legislation, procedures and protocols relating to fraud and corruption control legislation and procedures relating to public interest disclosures, protected disclosures or whistleblowing case studies and workplace scenarios to capture the range of fraud/corruption situations likely to be encountered |
Where and how to assess evidence | Valid assessment of this unit requires: a workplace environment or one that closely resembles normal work practice and replicates the range of conditions likely to be encountered when monitoring data for indicators of fraud and corruption, including coping with difficulties, irregularities and breakdowns in routine monitoring of data for indicators of fraud and corruption in a range of (3 or more) contexts (or occasions, over time) Assessment methods should reflect workplace demands, such as literacy, and the needs of particular groups, such as: people with disabilities people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people women young people older people people in rural and remote locations Assessment methods suitable for valid and reliable assessment of this competency may include, but are not limited to, a combination of 2 or more of: case studies demonstration observation portfolios projects questioning scenarios simulation or role plays authenticated evidence from the workplace and/or training courses |
For consistency of assessment | Evidence must be gathered over time in a range of contexts to ensure the person can achieve the unit outcome and/or apply the competency in different situations or environments. |
Range Statement
The Range Statement provides information about the context in which the unit of competency is carried out. The variables cater for differences between States and Territories and the Commonwealth, and between organisations and workplaces. They allow for different work requirements, work practices and knowledge. The Range Statement also provides a focus for assessment. It relates to the unit as a whole. Text in bold italics in the Performance Criteria is explained here. | |
Data may include: | electronic systems paper-based systems client data other individuals and organisations |
Stakeholders may include: | staff and senior management clients law enforcement agencies organisations providing data standards-setting organisations |
Purposes of data analysis may include: | response to ongoing or individual requests for information from specified people to check for particular information matching data as part of a random check conducting a needs assessment for fraud and corruption prevention and awareness activities generating and initiating fraud and corruption control activities |
Actions resulting from data interrogation may include: | investigation or inquiry legislative change administrative change policy change improved referral to another organisation for investigation |
Guidelines may include: | legislation and guidelines prepared by relevant standards-setting organisations |
Sectors
Not applicable.
Competency Field
Fraud Control.
Employability Skills
This unit contains employability skills.
Licensing Information
Not applicable.