The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Prepare for high-level written communication
|
|
Communicationobjectives are clarified, stakeholders are identified and political or other sensitivities are determined Completed |
Evidence:
|
Research is undertaken to anticipate the likely attitudes of and positions of stakeholders on the matter/s under consideration Completed |
Evidence:
|
Subject matter is researched/organised, key messages to be conveyed are distilled and tactics are planned to utilise written materials to maximise outcomes for the organisation in accordance with legislation, policy and guidelines Completed |
Evidence:
|
Critically analyse other positions
|
|
Other positions are considered critically to evaluate complex levels of meaning in written communication and to identify impartiality, bias or unsupported argument Completed |
Evidence:
|
Written materials are examined for subtext, significant inclusions and exclusions, socio-cultural values, attitudes and assumptions Completed |
Evidence:
|
Complex concepts and ideas are explored to clarify understanding, and justify, or challenge interpretations based on underlying assumptions, beliefs and values Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evidence is compared and contrasted and sources referred to are evaluated for reliability and authenticity Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evidence is used to test other positions and draw conclusions about their validity and strengths Completed |
Evidence:
|
Prepare persuasive written communication
|
|
Communication approach is chosen and used to positively influence and remove barriers to understanding for the given audience Completed |
Evidence:
|
Risk assessment is undertaken and risk management is implemented in relation to document preparation and content Completed |
Evidence:
|
Input information/documents provided by others are analysed for fit with the chosen approach and to ensure consistency of values, attitudes and opinions Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information is synthesised and complex documents are prepared in accordance with organisationalrequirements, legislation, policy and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Feedback from others is obtained on the documents' effectiveness for the purpose intended, outcomes are assessed and lessons learnt are articulated and used to underpin future writing Completed |
Evidence:
|
Feedback is provided to contributors of information/documents to improve future input in a manner that provides learning opportunities for the contributors Completed |
Evidence:
|
Prepare for high-level written communication
|
|
Communication objectives are clarified, stakeholders are identified and political or other sensitivities are determined. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Research is undertaken to anticipate the likely attitudes of and positions of stakeholders on the matter/s under consideration. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Subject matter is researched/organised, key messages to be conveyed are distilled and tactics are planned to utilise written materials to maximise outcomes for the organisation in accordance with legislation, policy and guidelines. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Critically analyse other positions
|
|
Other positions are considered critically to evaluate complex levels of meaning in written communication and to identify impartiality, bias or unsupported argument. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Written materials are examined for subtext, significant inclusions and exclusions, socio-cultural values, attitudes and assumptions. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Complex concepts and ideas are explored to clarify understanding, and justify, or challenge interpretations based on underlying assumptions, beliefs and values. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evidence is compared and contrasted and sources referred to are evaluated for reliability and authenticity. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evidence is used to test other positions and draw conclusions about their validity and strengths. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Prepare persuasive written communication
|
|
Communication approach is chosen and used to positively influence and remove barriers to understanding for the given audience. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Risk assessment is undertaken and risk management is implemented in relation to document preparation and content. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Input information/documents provided by others are analysed for fit with the chosen approach and to ensure consistency of values, attitudes and opinions. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information is synthesised and complex documents are prepared in accordance with organisational requirements, legislation, policy and procedures. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Feedback from others is obtained on the documents' effectiveness for the purpose intended, outcomes are assessed and lessons learnt are articulated and used to underpin future writing. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Feedback is provided to contributors of information/documents to improve future input in a manner that provides learning opportunities for the contributors. Completed |
Evidence:
|