The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Monitor and review
|
|
Hazard and risk assessment context and evaluation criteria are monitored, in accordance with organisational policies and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Risk assessment evaluation criteria are reviewed, in accordance with industry standards and guidelines Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify objectives and scope by research and consultation
|
|
Objectives and scope are identified using emergency risk management standards and guidelines Completed |
Evidence:
|
Stakeholder roles and required scope inputs are determined, in accordance with organisational policies and procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Budget, timeframe and schedule for research and consultation are determined, in accordance with organisational policies |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Community information is obtained, in accordance with organisational policies and procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify and consult with stakeholders
|
|
Stakeholders are identified, in accordance with organisational policies and communication procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Existing and potential liaison networks are identified and evaluated for relevance |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Stakeholder networks are developed using a range of strategies |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Communication and consultation are established, in accordance with organisational policies and procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Communication options are evaluated and selected to develop a communication plan |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Clarify roles and requirements with stakeholders
|
|
Stakeholder roles and their participation are clearly defined and emphasised in seeking their cooperation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Stakeholders are informed of the aims, objectives, risk management context and structure within which they must operate |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Stakeholder needs are determined with conflicting requirements being identified, recorded and communicated to relevant personnel |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop risk criteria with stakeholders
|
|
Social, environmental, financial and timeframe constraints are identified in consultation with stakeholders Completed |
Evidence:
|
Legal, technical and political considerations are identified in consultation with stakeholders |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Reasons and selection of criteria are negotiated and agreed with stakeholders |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Risk criteria and practical constraints are determined taking into account the community’s acceptance of risk |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Community expectations of acceptable risk are established
|
|
Hazard and risk assessment context and evaluation criteria are monitored, in accordance with organisational policies and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Risk assessment evaluation criteria are reviewed, in accordance with industry standards and guidelines |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|