The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Prepare appropriate documentation
|
|
Preparation of documentation is managed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Conditions of tendering the contract and specifications meet organisation/government policies and guidelines. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Tendering process conforms with tender/supply code. Completed |
Evidence:
|
An appropriately experienced officer is identified to handle all inquiries during the tender process and all tenderers are advised of clarifications. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Establish the basis of tendering
|
|
The form of tender, public or selective is determined. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Expressions of interest are sought. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Expressions of interest are evaluated and potential tenderers short listed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Receive and assess tenders
|
|
Documents are received and opened in accordance with organisational policies and procedures. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Tenders are checked for compliance with conditions set out in request for offers. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Details of tenders are compared with established evaluation criteria. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Checks are made to ensure that principles of probity, fairness and commercial confidentiality are met throughout the tender process. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Issues which may require negotiation are identified. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Select successful respondent/s
|
|
Selection is based on evaluation criteria and relevant factors affecting the tender. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Selection is ethically sound and does not breach probity principles. Completed |
Evidence:
|
All actual or potential conflicts of interests are disclosed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Where possible the contractor is selected from a registered panel of contractors who are proven to have the relevant expertise and capacity. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contractor's price and conditions are examined in order to determine that the offer is clear, calculable and not open to manipulation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
A cost-benefit analysis shows that the selected contractor offers best value for money. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Finalise contract details
|
|
Letter of acceptance outlines all relevant requirements for signing of documentation and satisfaction of pre-commencement conditions. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Discrepancies and disagreements about proposed supply arrangements are clarified and resolved prior to entering into the agreement. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contract is properly executed by the successful proponent and is in accordance with legal requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Unsuccessful tenderers are briefed if appropriate. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contract conditions are read and understood by all personnel involved in contract administration. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contract documents are prepared, approved and distributed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Fulfilment of any outstanding requirements is checked and rectified if necessary. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluate performance of the contract on completion
|
|
Contract conditions and responsibilities are reviewed with relevant personnel to ensure satisfactory completion of contract. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contract completion is authorised in writing to confirm completed services have been undertaken according to contract objectives and specifications. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contractor performance/level of service is evaluated against agreed benchmark. Completed |
Evidence:
|