The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Evaluate evidence for comparison
|
|
Type of comparative evidence is identified and examined to determine its forensic value in accordance with organisational policies, procedures and guidelines. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Examination regime is chosen to ensure the integrity of the process, samples and exhibits. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Standards and known samples are selected for inclusion in the comparative process based on relevance and integrity of source. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Conduct comparison
|
|
Characteristics are determined to facilitate comparison. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Characteristics are distinguished and evaluated in accordance with documented discipline procedures and quality system requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Verify and report results
|
|
Comparative processes and conclusions are subjected to peer review. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Results are reported in accordance with discipline and quality system requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|