Formats and tools
- Unit Description
- Reconstruct the unit from the xml and display it as an HTML page.
- Assessment Tool
- an assessor resource that builds a framework for writing an assessment tool
- Assessment Template
- generate a spreadsheet for marking this unit in a classroom environment. Put student names in the top row and check them off as they demonstrate competenece for each of the unit's elements and performance criteria.
- Assessment Matrix
- a slightly different format than the assessment template. A spreadsheet with unit names, elements and performance criteria in separate columns. Put assessment names in column headings to track which performance criteria each one covers. Good for ensuring that you've covered every one of the performance criteria with your assessment instrument (all assessement tools together).
- Wiki Markup
- mark up the unit in a wiki markup codes, ready to copy and paste into a wiki page. The output will work in most wikis but is designed to work particularly well as a Wikiversity learning project.
- Evidence Guide
- create an evidence guide for workplace assessment and RPL applicants
- Competency Mapping Template
- Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners. A template for developing assessments for a unit, which will help you to create valid, fair and reliable assessments for the unit, ready to give to trainers and students
- Observation Checklist
- create an observation checklist for workplace assessment and RPL applicants. This is similar to the evidence guide above, but a little shorter and friendlier on your printer. You will also need to create a seperate Assessor Marking Guide for guidelines on gathering evidence and a list of key points for each activity observed using the unit's range statement, required skills and evidence required (see the unit's html page for details)
- Self Assessment Survey
- A form for students to assess thier current skill levels against each of the unit's performance criteria. Cut and paste into a web document or print and distribute in hard copy.
- Moodle Outcomes
- Create a csv file of the unit's performance criteria to import into a moodle course as outcomes, ready to associate with each of your assignments. Here's a quick 'how to' for importing these into moodle 2.x
- Registered Training Organisations
- Trying to find someone to train or assess you? This link lists all the RTOs that are currently registered to deliver CPPACC5003A, 'Apply anthropometric principles to accessible building design and fitout'.
- Google Links
- links to google searches, with filtering in place to maximise the usefulness of the returned results
- Books
- Reference books for 'Apply anthropometric principles to accessible building design and fitout' on fishpond.com.au. This online store has a huge range of books, pretty reasonable prices, free delivery in Australia *and* they give a small commission to ntisthis.com for every purchase, so go nuts :)
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENT | PERFORMANCE CRITERIA | ||
1Determine the spread of body dimensions within a defined population. | 1.1 Key anatomical features of the human body are identified accurately. 1.2 Appropriate methodology for measuring key anatomical features is selected. 1.3 Anthropometric data is recorded in a recognised format appropriate for retrieval and statistical analysis in accordance with organisational requirements. | ||
2Analyse anthropometric data from a defined population and determine the statistical variations involved. | 2.1 Basic statistical analysis of data is applied to determine population variance. 2.2 Statistical parameters derived by appropriate analysis are reported in accordance with organisational requirements. 2.3 The analysis of findings is documented and reported using recognised statistical formats in accordance with organisational requirements. | ||
3Compare anthropometric data used in published architectural design documents with anthropometric data derived through measurement of a defined population. | 3.1 Published architectural design data is compared and verified against recent anthropometric data derived through measurement of a defined population. 3.2 Anthropometric data that proves different to published architectural design data is analysed to assess the extent of difference, possible causes for the difference and likely consequences of altering published architectural design data. | ||
4Identify the critical anthropometric features impacting on the ability of a person with a disability to work and function. | 4.1 The level of functioning of the person with a disability is determined in consultation with the client. 4.2 Anthropometric features relevant to the ability of the person with a disability to work and function independently are identified in consultation with the client using anthropometric methodology in accordance with organisational requirements. 4.3 Situations requiring specialist advice are identified and assistance is sought as required in accordance with organisational requirements. 4.4 Appropriate strategies for maximising the ability of the person with a disability to work and function independently are identified. 4.5 Identified strategies are communicated to the appropriate people for the design, construction and fitout of the client's premises. | ||