The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Formulate contract specifications.
|
|
Investment contract specifications are negotiated and formulated in consultation with relevant people. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Communication strategies and processes are established and implemented to assist ongoing communication between contract parties. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analysis is made of relevant information and legislation to provide strategic context to investment objectives. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Instructions are issued to consultants to prepare draft contract. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Applicable ethical, organisational and legislative requirements are interpreted and applied. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Undertake due diligence review.
|
|
Instructions are issued to relevant consultants to undertake due diligence review for assessment against feasibility study. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Impacts of due diligence review are documented and assessed against feasibility study outcomes. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Variations to feasibility study are identified and a decision made to proceed, renegotiate or withdraw as required. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Required variations to contract are negotiated and agreed between parties to reflect outcomes of due diligence process. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop investment contract.
|
|
Contract is prepared in appropriate style and format ensuring compliance with contract specifications and due diligence outcomes. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contract is reviewed to ensure accuracy of information and is disseminated to relevant people for feedback. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contract text is amended to include feedback from client in line with organisational policy and procedures. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Situations requiring specialist advice are identified and addressed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contract is finalised and settlement effected according to agreed timeframes. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluate investment contract.
|
|
Contract is reviewed using established evaluation methods relative to contract specifications. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Reliable evaluation methods are used, making efficient use of time and resources. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Verifiable conclusions are detailed with due diligence and according to feasibility outcomes. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Comments and recommendations are made available for review and reformulation of strategic goals and policies. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information is securely maintained with due regard to client confidentiality, and legislative and organisational requirements. Completed |
Evidence:
|